Great site/validator! I will never use another one but this one...
Multipage Validator Comments
Your comments help us improve our tools and are always appreciated. Drop-us a line!
2007-02-16, 10h35 : Martin Hellendoorn... valid site?
2006-11-15, 22h23 : TreeNet... valid site?
I love the design of this validator. So easy to use and understand.
Is there any chance of a version I could provide/run locally for clients?
Is there any chance of a version I could provide/run locally for clients?
2006-09-01, 9h34 : threerandot
I hope that eventually this can validate even more pages than it does now. For the moment though, it works beautifully.
2006-04-26, 13h01 : Scott... valid site?
There appears to be a validation bug. When I index/validate http://randsco.com, a number of the pages (>38) show [14] errors.
Yet, when I click on several of the pages and validate separately, the W3C shows as "Valid XHTML 1.1".
Likewise, when I click on several "[14]'s", I get the same result - "Valid XHTML 1.1"
I have saved a copy of the results page. Contact me if you would like a copy, to help track down this apparent BUG.
Also, there appears to be an index limit of 200 pages. Is this true?
-stk
Yet, when I click on several of the pages and validate separately, the W3C shows as "Valid XHTML 1.1".
Likewise, when I click on several "[14]'s", I get the same result - "Valid XHTML 1.1"
I have saved a copy of the results page. Contact me if you would like a copy, to help track down this apparent BUG.
Also, there appears to be an index limit of 200 pages. Is this true?
-stk
2006-04-06, 14h34 : Navarr... valid site?
Your Validator is great! There is one suggestion however,
I think it would be very cool if your validator also checked for valid CSS on all pages as well!
I think it would be very cool if your validator also checked for valid CSS on all pages as well!
2006-04-03, 10h54 : Marc-Antoine Ross... valid site?
Hi Gabriel,
Thank you for the comment. If you look at the Website you specified, you will see they have the W3C icon for CSS, not for HTML or xHTML.
Regards,
Marc-Antoine
Thank you for the comment. If you look at the Website you specified, you will see they have the W3C icon for CSS, not for HTML or xHTML.
Regards,
Marc-Antoine
2006-03-30, 16h17 : Gabriel Turk
Hi there, I am trying to understand if I am doing anything wrong with your validator tool. So far I have tried a dozen sites and non of them have a single page valid even though some of them are displaying the W3C logo. For example this page: http://mjsbigblog.com/ showed all 170+ pages non valid. Am I doing something wrong or people out there don't care to be W3C valid?
Thanks,
Gabriel.
Thanks,
Gabriel.
2006-03-03, 1h14 : Poil... valid site?
Your validator doesn't convert link with & to & !
The Multipage Validator is developed and maintained by Proze Network. It uses the W3C Validation Service. W3C owns copyrights of its service.
Proze Network provides the Multipage Validator under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Canada Licence.
